Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Deadbeat Zaddy's avatar

You’re right, but I think there is another layer.

This isn’t about society “hating male ambition.” It’s about incentives shifting and people noticing the outputs.

Men dominate spaces that reward risk, obsession, and indifference to stability. Women dominate spaces that reward consistency, structure, and social cohesion. That part has always been true.

What changed is which environments are rewarded.

The modern system favors structure. Women integrate into that cleanly. Men either specialize or drift.

That’s why you see two things at once:

Women rising inside institutions.

Men either excelling at the extremes or checking out entirely.

The podcast example actually proves the point. No gatekeepers. No structure. Just signal.

Men dominate there because the format rewards how they naturally communicate—long-form, competitive, unfiltered.

No one’s stopping women. They’re just not clustering there the same way.

The real issue isn’t that male ambition is being demonized.

It’s that it’s no longer being directed.

And undirected male energy doesn’t disappear.

It destabilizes.

That’s what people are reacting to—even if they don’t have language for it.

Warren perkin's avatar

When men can't get a job, they can't bond with a woman, can't form a family

https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf

A society which does not encourage men to contribute to it.... that society's days are numbered.

Three generations, tops.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_and_Culture

89 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?